
Comment and rate the approaches to value:
COST APPROACH: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS (DCF)
Format ❐❐ Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Adequacy of data ❐❐ Format ❐❐
Source of costs ❐❐ Adequacy of data and support for:
Land value estimate ❐❐ Holding Period ❐❐
Estimated cost new ❐❐ Growth Rates ❐❐
Depreciation estimate ❐❐ Discount Rate ❐❐
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: Development of Cash Flow Estimates ❐❐
Format ❐❐ Reversionary Value ❐❐
Adequacy of data ❐❐ Other Methods of Processing Income
Sources of data ❐❐ Stream (Mortgage Equity, Band of
Summary of sales table ❐❐ Investments, etc.) ❐❐
Use of adjustment grid table ❐❐RECONCILIATION:
Comparative analysis of sales ❐❐ Indicated values are:
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH: Cost Approach $ __________
Format ❐❐ Sales Comparison Approach $ __________
Selection of proper capitalization Income Approach $ __________
method ❐❐ DCF Analysis $ __________
Adequacy of data and support for: Other (Pending Sale, etc.)
Comparable Rentals ❐❐ Value Conclusion $ ________
Vacancy and Loss Factor ❐❐Allocation as Follows:
Operating History ❐❐ Land $ __________
Rent Roll ❐❐ Improvements $ __________
Income Estimate ❐❐ Personal Property $ __________
Expense Estimate ❐❐ Other $ __________
Net Operating Income ❐❐ Total Value $ ________
Capitalization Rate ❐❐
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Does the report contain a certification ❐ Ye s ❐ No Does the principal appraiser make
Is the report co-signed ❐ Ye s ❐ No statement of concurrence with value
Did the principal appraiser sign the conclusion ❐ Ye s ❐ No
report ❐ Ye s ❐ No Does the report contain appraiser(s)
Did the principal appraiser personally qualifications ❐ Ye s ❐ No
inspect subject property ❐ Ye s ❐ No
Acceptable Unacceptable Acceptable Unacceptable
Report Format Property Valuation:
Readability and neatness ❐❐ Feasibility/Profitability ❐❐
Mathematical accuracy ❐❐ Market Trends ❐❐
Exhibits (Photos, Maps, etc.) ❐❐ Cost Approach ❐❐
Appraiser’s analytical ability ❐❐ Sales Comparison Approach ❐❐
Purpose and function of appraisal ❐❐ Income Approach ❐❐
Property identification ❐❐ DCF ❐❐
Locational analysis ❐❐ Reconciliation ❐❐
Property Description ❐❐ Date of Appraisal ❐❐
Site ❐❐ Overall Rating of Appraisal
Improvements ❐❐
Highest and Best Use ❐❐
Brief Comments on Unacceptable Ratings:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Scope of Review: If reviewer does not concur with the soundness if conclusion, then
Read report ❐ Ye s ❐ No what is the recommended action:
Interviewed appraiser ❐ Ye s ❐ No ❐ Totally reject appraisal
Field Review ❐ Ye s ❐ No ❐ Have appraiser rework, revise, update the appraisal
Does the Reviewer concur with ❐ Have another appraisal prepared by someone else
the soundness of conclusion: ❐ Ye s ❐ No ❐ Other
Concluding Comments:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reviewer’s Signature _____________________________________________________________________________________________
Name of Reviewer __________________________________________________________________ Date ________________________
Position ___________________________________________________________________________ Department __________________
Address __________________________________________________________________________ Telephone ___________________
City, State, Zip __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Copyright © by the National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriters P.O. Box 879, Palm Springs, California, 92263 USA. This form Review Form No. 4002
may be reproduced without written consent, however, the “National Association of Review Appraisers and Mortgage Underwriter’s must be acknowledged and credited.
SECTION VI — Property Valuation
Section VII — Other Report Requirements
Section VIII — Final Rating of Appraisal
Section IX — Reviewer’s Conclusions — Recommendations